Category Archives: Investing

Back To Normal?

Posted April 11, 2018 by paragon. tags:Tags: , , , ,
Screen Shot 2018-04-09 at 4_opt

Written by Nathan White, Chief Investment Officer

After a tremendous start in January (and what seemed like a continuation of 2017), the markets finally hit some long-anticipated turbulence in February and March.

The stock market had been riding a nice wave. Last quarter, I suggested it was a prudent time to review allocations and risk exposure while the markets were doing well. Now that volatility has returned, let’s review current conditions and factors, as well as future considerations.

The current economic conditions are generally considered to be exemplary of the late stage of an economic cycle. However, cycles can run longer than anticipated, and there is no way to know exactly when they will end. The effects of the fiscal stimulus are helping to extend the economic cycle, but they could also increase the potential for inflation to finally rear its head. A characteristic of a late economic cycle is where the economy continues to do well, but asset price declines or increases only moderately.

A research report from NDR (Ned Davis Research, Economics/Global Comment March 2018) indicates that two-thirds of countries are growing above their long-term growth potential, which last happened in 2000 and 2007 before major recessions. However, the dangerous threshold could still be a year or so out, and the timing can be tricky. Does this mean we are bearish? No. We are just getting cautious. There are still a lot of positives, but it is our job to investigate the risks.

Our risk models are indicating a rise in risk. Our trend and breadth models, while still bullish overall, have deteriorated. We are monitoring these closely. Equity valuations are still broadly high, but earnings are forecasted to grow nearly 20% for the year. We will be watching for changes to these results and expectations. Another characteristic of a late economic cycle is a flattening yield curve. This occurs when short-term rates exceed long-term rates. The curve has been flattening as the Federal Reserve increases interest rates, but for various reasons, long-term yields have not moved commensurately. The following graphic on the next page helps put the current environment in perspective.

Investing is a long-term game, and trying to time exits can be hazardous to returns — especially if future returns are harder to come by (i.e. lower). You will need to keep exposure to get returns. Stay invested — but be flexible in the mix of those investments.

Remember, pullbacks are a normal part of market action and create opportunities. What is not normal is the absence of pullbacks (like we experienced in 2017). The trillions of dollars — pumped into the markets by global central banks since the Financial Crisis — has smoothed out volatility and market corrections. The latter should increase as central banks begin to reverse course. Keeping interest rates so low for so long has encouraged massive borrowing at cheap rates. Corporate borrowing has surged with U.S. companies’ debt reaching their highest levels since 2000. Many companies have been able to borrow at rates and amounts that wouldn’t

have been possible in a “normal” rate environment. As rates rise, the cost of servicing this debt will increase and could expose many weak hands. This is healthy in the long-term, though, as it discourages wasteful or inefficient use of precious resources. The real question is that as credit conditions normalize, what will be the effects on markets and the economy? I believe current market conditions to be exemplary of returning to a more normal environment.

STRATEGY REVIEW

The S&P 500 ended down for the quarter, and only two of 11 S&P 500 sectors posted gains and outperformed — Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Bonds were also down for the quarter as they face an uphill battle of rising interest rates. Within TopFlight, all three of the strategies (Fundamental, Momentum, and Seasonality) were up slightly for the quarter. Some of the best performers within our Momentum strategy were Nvidia, NetApp and Micron Technology. Our small cap momentum stocks generally lagged in the first quarter but closed the gap by quite a bit in March. Within our Fundamental stocks, the best performers were Northrup Grumman, Ruths Hospitality and Eastman Chemical. After a difficult 2017, our Seasonality strategy posted a gain for the quarter as well. We continue to like the valuation position of our current stock holdings. Their collective forward P/E (price/earnings) multiple is about 14.8 versus 17.4 for the S&P 500, which is about 15% less expensive. Many of these holdings are industrial and materials companies that could benefit more from the tax cuts and possible infrastructure spending.

Our Managed Income portfolio ended the quarter slightly down, primarily due to the slide in equities. We continue to maintain about 40% of the portfolio in short-term corporate bonds, which will allow us to capture the rise in interest rates without getting hit with significant capital losses. Another 15% of the portfolio is in intermediate Treasuries. We continue to avoid long-term bonds.

Going forward, our models still indicate a reasonable case for further stock market gains, but probably not on the level of past years. Inflation trends are still positive for now, and the strong economy and earnings growth outweigh the concerns I discussed earlier. But as the risks increase and the economic cycle matures, it is important to have a more flexible approach with your investments to control risks and take advantage of opportunities. This is exactly the way we like to manage investments.

If you have questions about your allocation and risk exposure, please give us a call. We are here and happy to help.

Disclaimer: 1. Investment performance reflects time-weighted, size-weighted geometric composite returns of actual client accounts. 2. Investment returns are net of all management fees and transaction costs, and reflect the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.  3. The S&P Index is a market-value weighted index comprised of 500 stocks selected for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index is a benchmark index made up of the Barclays Government/Corporate Bond Index.  4. Benchmarks are used for comparative purposes only. The Paragon Top Flight Portfolio is not designed to track the S&P Index and will have results different from the benchmark. The Paragon Managed Income Portfolio is not designed to track the Barclays Bond Aggregate Index. 5. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Calm Seas?

Posted January 10, 2018 by paragon. tags:Tags: ,
Pier at Sunset_opt

Written by Nathan White, Chief Investment Officer

For the stock market, 2017 was a year of unprecedented smooth sailing. The S&P 500 has risen for 14 months straight, a new record. It also didn’t have a monthly decline, which has never happened before. Volatility was non-existent. The economy continues to move along with no signs of an imminent recession. Moreover, there have been no corrections in sight.

The latest global manufacturing indexes (PMIs) ended with the strongest reading in nearly seven years. Many of our forward-looking economic indicators also point to even faster growth in the coming months. New orders and export orders are at their highest levels since early 2011. The ratio of new orders to inventories matched its strongest level since June 2014. Backlogs are at the highest point since May 2010. On the back of this strong data, job growth looks set to expand further. (Source: NDR – Economics, Global Comment, 1/3/2018) 

Price pressures are strong but have not exploded, which means inflation is still modest. In 2018, we will be watching to see if the tax cuts and possible infrastructure spending will push inflation expectations higher. Interest rates are still low overall, but moving up. The bond market could become a problem in the coming year (more on that later). Other risk factors coming from our models are high equity valuations and extremely optimistic investor sentiment. Most of our models are still positive, so it remains a bull market until proven otherwise.

2017 REVIEW 

The best performing areas of the equity market last year were large-cap stocks, growth stocks and the technology sector. Small-cap and value stocks, while still up for the year, lagged the broader market. It will be interesting to see if value stocks make a comeback in 2018.

Top Flight had good performance being up 18.5% for the year. It was up about 11.9% for the last six months of the year, which was about a half percent better than the S&P 500 after fees. As you know, in 2017 we started taking individual stock holdings that comprise about 60-64% of the Top Flight portfolio. We have been pleased with the result. Our stock holdings overall averaged nearly 21.5% for the year. The stock portfolio is broken down into two segments. The first is a fundamental-based approach that focuses on stocks with the least downside risk. These stocks performed well and were up about 25.5% for the year. Considering these stocks have somewhat of a value/quality aspect, this was an impressive showing. The second segment of our stock holdings is a momentum or trend-based approach. This segment was up just shy of 18% for the year. Within this segment, the small-cap names did the best, particularly in the last half of the year. Overall, the best performing individual names were Home Depot, United Health Group, Domtar, Owens Corning, and Northrop Grumman.

Looking ahead for 2018, we like the valuation position of our equity holdings. The forward PE (price/earnings) multiple of our stock holdings is about 16.8 versus 19.8 for the S&P 500. This means our current holdings are about 15% cheaper based upon projected earnings for next year. Not a bad place to be after the significant upward move in equities.

Top Flight also includes two other strategies based on ETFs. One strategy is a seasonality approach that rotates among various sectors and industries. This strategy comprises 20-25% of Top Flight and was up about 11% for 2017. While up for the year, seasonality was our weakest performing strategy last year. However, in the prior three years it was our best performing ETF strategy. Our approach with Top Flight is to diversify by strategy. No strategy will outperform every year, and due to its solid long-term record, we still have confidence with the seasonality method. The second ETF strategy we employ is a single ETF momentum-based strategy. This strategy, which comprises 10% of Top Flight’s allocation, performed well on the year and was up over 25%. Most of this performance came from the PowerShares QQQ, which is heavily weighted in large-cap technology.

On the conservative side, our Managed Income portfolio had a net return of about three percent. Still not ideal, but we are constrained by the environment of low yields. We achieved similar returns to our benchmark, but with a lot less risk to rising interest rates. To get a higher return, we would have had to load up on risky debt, which would have only produced an additional 1-2% return. Not worth it in our estimation. We still do not recommend long-term bonds. The bond market is getting backed into a corner. As interest rates rose last year, it was short-term rates that moved up while the yields on longer maturity bonds didn’t move (or went down slightly). The difference in yield between the two and 10-year Treasury bonds is now only about a half percent. The Federal Reserve is set to raise interest rates another 0.75% to 1% next year. If longer maturity bond yields do not start going up, it won’t take long for short-term bond yields to exceed them. This is called an inverted yield curve and is often a harbinger of recession. If longer maturity bond yields do move up with the Federal Reserve actions, then 10-year Treasury could lose at least 5%, and longer maturities 15% or more. Because of these dynamics in the bond market, we are not as exposed to interest rate risk as most bond portfolios. We don’t hold any maturities longer than 10 years and the Treasuries we do hold are a hedge against any possible stock market correction. Keeping most of our fixed income exposure to shorter-term maturities allows us to increase our yields as interest rates rise without getting hit with significant capital losses.

MAKE HAY WHILE THE SUN SHINES 

The roaring stock market offers investors an opportunity to review their asset allocation. Now is the time to rebalance — not when the inexorable correction comes. Most have the tendency to put money into whatever has been doing well. To keep the proper risk exposure, investors should trim their exposure to stocks as stocks increase. One of my favorite axioms is to take what the markets give you, but unfortunately, investors have short memories. The increase in the stock market has simultaneously increased allocation to stocks. When the correction occurs, those who have not re-allocated will take a bigger hit to their portfolios than they can actually stomach. Please contact us if you would like to re-view your allocation.

We appreciate your trust and business and wish you a prosperous and happy 2018!

Disclaimer: 1. Investment performance reflects time-weighted, size-weighted geometric composite returns of actual client accounts. 2. Investment returns are net of all management fees and transaction costs, and reflect the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.  3. The S&P Index is a market-value weighted index comprised of 500 stocks selected for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index is a benchmark index made up of the Barclays Government/Corporate Bond Index.  4. Benchmarks are used for comparative purposes only. The Paragon Top Flight Portfolio is not designed to track the S&P Index and will have results different from the benchmark. The Paragon Managed Income Portfolio is not designed to track the Barclays Bond Aggregate Index. 5. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Stocking Up

Posted October 22, 2017 by paragon. tags:Tags: , ,
Fall Time in the Park_opt

Written by Nathan White, Chief Investment Officer

How long will this upward move in stocks last? It’s a constant and valid concern, especially considering how well the markets have done for years. What will end the rally?

We are currently dealing with elevated valuation and sentiment levels, historically low volatility, rising interest rates, reversal of quantitative easing, terrorism, natural disasters, political uncertainty, and more. It is impossible to know what concern will finally “stick” and be the material cause for a correction. Sometimes markets just simply get exhausted to the upside. However, as there are always market concerns, being on the right side of the trend is more important. The current trend and economic indicators remain supportive of further stock outperformance. The market quite literally climbs a continual wall of worry. We will keep monitoring our models for indications of risk, but for now the weight of the evidence remains bullish.

If I had to pick my primary concern, it would be the potential effects from the Fed’s reversal of quantitative easing. The Fed’s quantitative easing actions (i.e. bond asset purchases) have provided tremendous liquidity to the markets. How long the markets will be able to move higher in the face of this withdrawal remains to be seen. There is usually a lag time for Fed actions to be felt in the economy and markets. As the Fed is starting slow, it may be some time before what is now being dubbed quantitative tightening (QT) has a material effect. We will watch the process with great interest.

On the constructive side, economic data continues to be positive globally. According to our indicators, recession is still not in the cards anytime soon. U.S. economic growth grew at 3.1% in the second quarter, which was slightly higher than expected. Manufacturing activity is the highest in 13 years and service-sector activity is the highest in 12 years. While stocks are expensive right now, they are not at extremes. Corporate profit growth remains positive and is offsetting the slow pace of rising interest rates. While interest rates are rising they are still extremely low on a historical scale. The prospect of fiscal policy being passed is still supporting the markets due to the potential economic shot in the arm it could provide.

Another positive is that we are heading into what is seasonally the best time of year for stocks. Additionally, the majority of global markets are trading above their moving averages, suggesting that momentum continues to support further gains.

Before this quarter, one of our concerns was that the breadth of the market advance was not very wide — only a few sectors and stocks were making up the bulk of the advance. However, last quarter alleviated some of these worries as the first half laggards such as small caps, energy, and value stocks rallied nicely. The final weeks of the quarter saw a rotation back into many of the “Trump trade” stocks.

Last quarter was good for the stocks in our Top Flight portfolio, which was up 6.3% for the quarter compared to 4.5% for the S&P 500 Index. Our stock portfolio is broken down into two segments and is currently comprised of 30 holdings of 2% each (60% total). The first is a fundamental based approach that focuses on stocks with the least downside risk. These stocks gained about 6.4% on average for the quarter. The second segment is a momentum or trend-based approach. The small cap segment of this approach was up about 11.2% and the large/mid-cap segment was up about 9.8% for the quarter. The best performers came from the auto parts industry with BorgWarner and Lear both up around 20% and 18% respectively for the quarter. Other good performers were building material companies such as Owens-Corning and Continental Building. Vertex Pharmaceuticals performed nicely after positive data on its cystic fibrosis drug. We also saw continued good performance from our aerospace and defense holdings of L3 Technologies, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Booz Allen Hamilton. Many of the small and mid-cap names did particularly well in September, accounting for much of the gain for the quarter.

Top Flight also includes two ETF based strategies. One strategy is based on a seasonality approach that rotates among various sectors and industries. It is comprised of three to five positions of 5% each. This strategy has been an underperformer this year and is only up about 2%. It was dragged down in the first half of the year by energy and retail exposure. While seasonality has been disappointing this year, it has been a good performer in prior years, sometimes attributable for the bulk of the gains in Top Flight. We still have confidence in this approach. The other ETF strategy is a single ETF momentum-based strategy, which is about 10 percent of the portfolio. This segment has had a single holding all year so far, the PowerShares QQQ, which is heavily weighted in technology. It is up about 22.5% for the year.

We are still grinding along in the Managed Income portfolio. Due to the low yields and the risk of extremely high prices, we are still keeping our powder dry. We are getting similar returns as the benchmark (for a lot less risk) and we are not locked into today’s low rates. Most broad-based bond funds or conservative portfolios are comprised of various mixes of longer-dated bonds. As interest rates rise, the losses on those bonds will offset the meager yields offered. Most fixed income funds or portfolios are sitting on a pile of future potential losses. There is no avoiding the dilemma, and even if interest rates didn’t rise they would be stuck with their current low yields. Therefore, we have minimized our exposure to longer-dated bonds. We believe our portfolio to be more conservatively positioned. We still prefer shorter maturity bonds, and as interest rates have risen their yields have improved. Short maturity bonds allow us to increase our yields as interest rates rise without getting hit with capital losses. While we know it is hard to accept low returns, it is better than reaching for yield and taking bigger risks like so many investors are doing. Don’t succumb to the desperation many are giving in to! Yield chasing can be hazardous to your financial health. It’s better to get a lower, more stable return than to put too much at risk.

Disclaimer: 1. Investment performance reflects time-weighted, size-weighted geometric composite returns of actual client accounts. 2. Investment returns are net of all management fees and transaction costs, and reflect the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.  3. The S&P Index is a market-value weighted index comprised of 500 stocks selected for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index is a benchmark index made up of the Barclays Government/Corporate Bond Index.  4. Benchmarks are used for comparative purposes only. The Paragon Top Flight Portfolio is not designed to track the S&P Index and will have results different from the benchmark. The Paragon Managed Income Portfolio is not designed to track the Barclays Bond Aggregate Index. 5. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Keep On Keeping On

Posted October 15, 2017 by paragon. tags:Tags: , ,
Fall Mountains-1

Written by David Young, President and Founder of Paragon Wealth Management

Last quarter was a continuation of what has gone on since last year’s election: The markets keep going up. Leadership changed and rotated to Small Caps taking the lead this quarter. Small Caps lagged in the first quarter (and again in August), but then took off in September to get back in line with the other averages.

The leading indexes change from quarter to quarter, rotating between the S&P 500, the NASDAQ, Emerging Markets, International Markets and Small Caps. But the bottom line is that the market trend is up.

Assuming your investment strategy is sound, this past quarter proves the “long term argument” of waiting patiently for your strategy to pay off. Our portfolios continue to provide good performance.

I am repeatedly asked, “How long can this market keep going up?” and “With all of the problems and concerns, why does the market keep going up?”

Regarding “how long,” no one knows for sure. We are currently breaking records for the period of time we have gone without a correction. Based on our models, the market is fully valued. We are to be cautious — but still stay invested.

History shows that markets can continue going up even when they are at full value. Last year, before the election, many pundits recommended jumping out of the market. Sadly, they are now significantly behind and are still waiting for their opportunity to get back into the market. Others got out during the 2008 Crash … and have still never gotten back in. The markets are seemingly biding their time and waiting for earnings to catch up with stock prices. Usually, you would have seen a sell-off by this stage in the cycle.

THREE PERCENT GROWTH 

To answer the question of why the market is going up, I’ve pulled some content from a recent article in the Wall Street Journal by Phil Gramm and Michael Solon. They were making an argument unrelated to the stock market, but I will use talking points from their article to explain the “why.”

Stock valuations are based on their underlying earning power. When companies are expected to make more money, their stock price goes up. Conversely, when companies are expected to make less money, their stock price goes down.

Complicating things, stock prices are not necessarily based on what is actually happening; they are based on investor expectations.

Looking at the big picture, GDP is a measure of the growth of the U.S. economy. In the postwar era, the U.S. averaged 3.4% annual growth from 1948 through 2008. We averaged 3% growth for half of the George W. Bush presidency (2003-06).

Only with 3% or higher growth does America experience measurable progress in poverty reduction, strong job creation and income growth.

Many talking heads argue that the days of 3% growth are gone and that America’s economy has lost its ability to grow at 3% above inflation.

From 2009-12, the Obama administration, the Congressional Budget Office and the Federal Reserve all thought they saw 3% growth just around the corner. If the possibility of 3% growth is gone forever, it hasn’t been gone very long.

America enjoyed 3% growth for so long it’s practically become our national birthright. Census data show that real economic growth averaged 3.7% from 1890-1948. British economist Angus Maddison estimates that the U.S. averaged 4.2% real growth from 1820-89. Based on all available data, America has enjoyed an average real growth rate of more than 3% since the founding of the nation, despite the Civil War, two world wars, the Great Depression and at least 32 recessions and financial panics. If 3% growth has slipped from our grasp, we certainly had it for a long time before we lost it.

During the Obama presidency, growth slipped to an unbelievable low of 1.47%. As a result, many Americans believe 3% growth is gone forever.

Phil Gramm argues that most of the growth constraints we face today are directly attributable to the Obama era policies. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that labor-productivity growth since 2010 has plummeted to less than one-quarter of the average for the previous 20, 30 or 40 years. Productivity fell during the current recovery, not during the recession. With high marginal tax rates, especially on investment income, new investment during the Obama era managed only to offset depreciation, so the value of the capital stock per worker, the engine of the American colossus, stopped expanding and contributed nothing to growth.

A tidal wave of new rules and regulations across health care, financial services, energy and manufacturing forced companies to spend billions on new capital and labor that served government and not consumers. Banks hired compliance officers rather than loan officers. Energy companies spent billions on environmental compliance costs, and none of it produced energy more cheaply or abundantly. Health-insurance premiums skyrocketed but with no additional benefit to the vast majority of covered workers.

In 2006, when the labor force participation rate was 66.2%, the BLS predicted that demographic changes would push it down to 65.5% by 2016. Under Mr. Obama’s policies, it actually fell further, to 62.8%, and the number of working-age Americans not in the labor market spiked to 55 million.

By waiving work requirements for welfare, lowering food-stamp eligibility requirements and easing standards for disability payments, Mr. Obama’s policies disincentivized work. Disability rolls have expanded 18.6% during the current recovery, compared with a 16% decline during the Reagan recovery.

If reversing the Obama era policies simply eliminated half the gap between the projected 1.8% growth rate and the average growth rates during the Reagan and Clinton recoveries, it would deliver 3% real growth generating nearly $3.5 trillion in new federal revenues over the next 10 years.

Since 1960, the American economy has experienced 30 years with growth of 3% or more. Seventy-nine percent of all jobs created since 1960 were created during those years. The poverty rate fell by 72% and real median household income rose by $20,519. In the 26 years when the economy had less than 3% growth, just 21% of all post-1960 jobs were created, the poverty rate rose by 37% and household income fell by $12,004. With 3% growth, the American dream is achievable and virtually anybody willing to work hard can live it.

BOTTOM LINE 

If you listen to the national narrative about how scary and awful things are, it makes no sense why the market continues to go up.

On the other hand, when you understand that as a result of our last election, most investors “expect” that there will be major tax, healthcare and regulatory reform that should take us back to the policies that brought us 3% growth, the upward market trend starts to make sense.

As always, let us know if you have questions or need anything from us.

Disclaimer: 1. Investment performance reflects time-weighted, size-weighted geometric composite returns of actual client accounts. 2. Investment returns are net of all management fees and transaction costs, and reflect the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.  3. The S&P Index is a market-value weighted index comprised of 500 stocks selected for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index is a benchmark index made up of the Barclays Government/Corporate Bond Index.  4. Benchmarks are used for comparative purposes only. The Paragon Top Flight Portfolio is not designed to track the S&P Index and will have results different from the benchmark. The Paragon Managed Income Portfolio is not designed to track the Barclays Bond Aggregate Index. 5. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Mid-Year Review And Outlook

Posted July 12, 2017 by paragon. tags:Tags: , , , ,
Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 4_opt

Written by Nathan White, Chief Investment Officer

Volatility in the equity and bond markets has been at historic lows. The economy has been strong enough to support stocks, but not too strong to disturb bonds. While still on the expensive side, equity markets are being sustained by growing earnings. They are also still anticipating an increase in economic growth based on upcoming fiscal and policy measures. If the intended reforms keep getting delayed, it could result in a return of volatility in the second half of the year.

Global growth has been improving, and so far looks to be around 3.4% for the year compared with 2.3% for the U.S. As growth in places like Europe has improved, the ECB is setting up to follow the Fed’s footsteps in tapering its extremely accommodative monetary stance. Central banks are becoming more hawkish and could be worried about financial stability. That means they need to keep/start tightening to stay ahead of any issues and build up their ammunition. But for now, asset prices keep improving in this low inflation environment.

Recently there have been indications that the leaders of the first half of the year seem to be overdone. Whether it is simply profit taking or an outright rotation remains to be seen. We could see a churning process throughout the summer as the market tries to digest the first half gains and anticipate the environment and factors that will affect the second half of the year. For now, 75% of industries are still in uptrends. The majority of our models are bullish, but we have seen deterioration in some areas. We would like to see a broader advance across all segments rather than just the narrow leadership that has occurred. Our sentiment models are flashing caution, as they are in the overly optimistic zone. Earnings growth must continue in order to support current high valuations in the face of rising bonds yields.

Growth names doing well in a low economic growth enviroment? 

On the face of it, you would think growth stocks would do better in a high-growth environment, as opposed to the current moderate economic growth conditions. Well, markets aren’t always logical. As the stocks that benefitted from the Trump rally stalled along with his reform agenda, growth stocks took over and became first half leaders. Sectors such as Technology and Healthcare have been the best performers. In an environment of moderate growth, investors placed a premium on names that are currently growing. Much of the focus was concentrated in large mega-cap names such as Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. These five names accounted for about one third of the S&P 500’s year-to-date gain. They are basically defensive names in a low-growth environment. Our exposure to these names has accounted for most of TopFlight’s gains as well.

Our seasonality model, which has performed well the last few years, was a laggard in the first half of the year. The energy sector tends to dominate this model in the first half of a year, but energy stocks have been poor performers due to the drop in oil prices. Seasonality signals are not high conviction through summer months. Small-cap stocks have also been trailing large-cap stocks, as they are more economically sensitive. We have observed this in our small cap momentum stocks as well.

Outlook for the second half of the year 

If a rotation out of the first half leaders develops, we could see a move from growth into value. This would better benefit the energy and financials relative to the technology and large cap growth names. We have had a slant toward value and small-cap in the first half of the year. These stocks will potentially benefit from a shift of growth to value in the second half of the year. We will keep exposure to the high-flying names for now, but want to keep exposure to the value names that have lagged, as they could benefit from a rotation in the second half of the year. If the Trump agenda gets close to becoming reality again, then our small-cap and value exposure could take off.

With oil breaking down, it creates an opportunity in the energy names. Sentiment on the sector is extremely low, and large financial traders drive oil prices in the short run. In the end, low prices are the cure for low prices in commodities. We don’t know where the bottom will be, but are watching this sector for potential plays in the stronger names.

Managed Income 

Interest rates are slowly heading higher. The Fed has raised rates twice this year and is indicating one more increase later in the year and additional ones next year. The Fed also announced it will start to reduce its massive holdings later this year. This will put pressure on bond prices — warranting caution with one’s bond exposure. We still do not recommend buying long maturity bonds, especially as yields have fallen. The extremely low yields are still not worth the risk of owning at these elevated prices. However, we are still in a waiting game until we can lock in higher yields. We have a significant amount of capital to deploy, and we want to wait for a more favorable environment. As yields have come down on longer maturity bonds, they have moved higher for short-term bonds due to the Fed raising rates. A flatter yield curve calls for shifting into cash rather than bonds. We favor short-term corporate bonds where the yields have moved up but the prices have not. We only want to use Treasury bonds as protection as opposed to an outright investment.

We are watching some oversold names in the REIT and telecom space. For example, in the heavily damaged retail space, Tanger Factory Outlet Center (SKT) is looking attractive. With its modern stores and attractive locations, it has been drawing customers away from traditional malls. Its retail tenants comprise unique desired brands along with a discount aspect enabling Tanger to boast a 95% occupancy level. The stock also has a 5.2% yield.

Disclaimer: 1. Investment performance reflects time-weighted, size-weighted geometric composite returns of actual client accounts. 2. Investment returns are net of all management fees and transaction costs, and reflect the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.  3. The S&P Index is a market-value weighted index comprised of 500 stocks selected for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index is a benchmark index made up of the Barclays Government/Corporate Bond Index.  4. Benchmarks are used for comparative purposes only. The Paragon Top Flight Portfolio is not designed to track the S&P Index and will have results different from the benchmark. The Paragon Managed Income Portfolio is not designed to track the Barclays Bond Aggregate Index. 5. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Put The Odds In Your Favor

Posted November 4, 2015 by paragon. tags:Tags: , ,
Stock Market Graph

Written by Nate White, Chief Investment Officer of Paragon Wealth Management

This article is from Paragon’s Third Quarter Newsletter. If you are interested in receiving a free printed copy of Paragon’s Quarterly Newsletter, please click here.

Investing encompasses two of the most powerful human emotions — fear and greed. In light of the recent market volatility, your biggest fear, without a doubt, is losing money. No one likes to see account values go down. So how much should you worry about losing money with your investments? And how valid is that fear when viewed through a historical lens?

We all know investing is a long-term process. I would take that one step further and propose that the main risk is not being invested. And history proves it.

Fear of the downside prevents people from investing correctly. When markets become volatile or economic fear increases, the apprehension is over values dropping in the present moment. Often the fear is that the values will drop and never come back. No one ever wants to see their accounts drop by 20 or 50 percent — and then never recover. But when in the history of the markets have they ever not come back? Never. Even still, it is amazing to hear this irrational concern over and over and over again.

When markets drop, many people sell out or change to a more conservative allocation, thereby effectively locking in their losses. When someone sells out as the market is going down, they rarely get back in at a lower price. If you sell out when the market is down 5 or 10 percent, when do you intend to get back in? When the market is down 15 to 20 percent? Usually the fears that cause someone to sell do not subside before the market rebounds (and it often become worse). By the time the waters have calmed and the investor’s confidence has returned, the market has moved higher than the point from which they sold.

In fact, if someone doesn’t recover from a market downturn, it is usually because their allocation was overly risky going into the downturn or they changed to a conservative allocation during the slide. It’s not because the markets didn’t recover. For example, if you were overloaded on tech stocks or financials before their respective crashes in the previous decade, you probably had a hard time recovering. People tend to load up on the “hot” things during boom times only to get sorely disappointed when those assets come back down to earth.

Now back to my claim that the real risk is in not being invested. Long-term risks are always harder to confront rationally because they are not immediate concerns. In order to help overcome the fear of the market’s downside, please consider the accompanying table. It displays the historical probabilities of a profit in various timeframes for stocks (S&P 500), 10-year Treasury bonds and a mix of 20% stocks and 80% bonds from 1928 through 2014. The stock market’s chances of being up in a single year have been over 70% — and it only gets better the longer you hold. There has never been a 20-year (and nearly a 15-year) period where stocks have been down. Most people entering retirement today have more than 20 years of “investable” time. Now, I’m not recommending a 100% stocks portfolio for retirees, but the principle remains strong.

For those who are more risk averse or require a more stable portfolio, look at the figures in the 20/80 mix of stocks and bonds. It is better than even a portfolio of pure Treasury bonds in that it has had a better average annual return (6.3% vs. 5.0%) for the same amount of downside risk. This portfolio had only two negative three-year periods out of 85 occurrences and has never had a negative five-year period. Talk about putting the odds in your favor!

Not one of us has control over the market, but we do have control over letting time work in our favor. This table shows that negative periods are in such an impressive minority that they should be looked upon as opportunities — or at least ignored from an investing standpoint. Not many people wanted to invest during the 2008-2009 financial crisis — and I get it. The headlines were scary and it seemed as though the economy might collapse. But in hindsight, it was a great buying opportunity very few took advantage of.

There will always be things to worry about — and today is no exception. Consider that the period covered in the above review included the worst World War ever, a Great Depression and 12 recessions, the Cold War, numerous other wars and conflicts, oil shocks, inflation shocks, strong and weak dollar periods, debt bubbles, fiscal crises, various housing booms and busts, technology booms and busts, and both Republicans and Democrats. Despite all these hazards, the markets have moved up, reflecting the virtues of a free market and providing an effective method for investors to build their wealth. Don’t be left out!

Disclaimer Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

 

Why Use An Active Manager?

Posted January 28, 2015 by paragon. tags:Tags: , , ,
Senior investment officers

Because certain indexes have performed well over the past few years, those who promote passive investing are recommending that you follow the current fad and just buy index funds. Passive investing can be useful if it is done right. However, it can be dangerous done blindly. Passive strategies are fully exposed to the whims of the market and can expose investors to significant declines and risks. With this approach you must be aware that you will likely go through a 50% decline at some point.

Making money is difficult. Keeping your money is even harder. There seems to be ten ways to lose money for every one way there is to make it. To complicate things further, managing investments is counterintuitive. Research repeatedly shows that most people invest when they shouldn’t and don’t invest when they should. According to studies by Dalbar, for the 30 year period ending December 2013 the average stock market investor earned only 3.69% compounded versus 11.11% compounded for the broad stock market. Underperformance of 7.42% annually for 30 years is a huge penalty for the “average” investor to pay.

The bottom line is that if you do not have the time, resources, and expertise to manage your money then you are walking into a minefield. Over the years I have seen countless people lose their entire savings to bad investment decisions. Whether it be through leveraged real estate, misguided business ventures, poorly structured annuities, bad stock choices, expensive life insurance, loans to relatives, or even offshore investments, the end result is always the same. They lose their savings and what was once a good situation turns into a bad one.

Your success has brought you money. That money can be a blessing or a curse. If you manage it properly then it can help you simplify and enjoy your life by allowing you to do whatever is most important to you. If you don’t make good money decisions then it can bring you more grief than good.

Everywhere you turn there are different voices telling you how to invest. Financial news channels, magazines, insurance companies, infomercials, self-proclaimed experts, etc. There is no shortage of free advice. The problem is that most free advice is worth about what it costs.

Paragon has been guiding investors for 28 years. We have experienced, survived and thrived in some of the most difficult markets in U.S. history. Those very difficult markets include the Crash of 1987, the Asian Crisis of 1998, the Tech Collapse of 2000 and the Financial Crisis of 2008. We have steadily grown in the face of adversity.

Our clients are our friends. We are their guide. Our money is invested right alongside theirs. Most clients initially choose Paragon because of our stellar investment performance. However, as time goes on they realize that our highest value is actually protecting them from their inexperience and stopping them from making bad investments. It is our mission to help you make the right decisions and find financial peace.

Written by Dave Young, President & Founder of Paragon Wealth Management

Disclaimer
Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Adjustment Period

Posted October 22, 2014 by admin. tags:Tags: , , , , , , ,
Rolling hills and fall colors

The era of QE has been a difficult environment for active managers. The last five years have been a heyday for the passive investor, aided directly and indirectly by the Fed’s Quantitative Easing (QE) programs, stocks and bonds have moved up in an indiscriminate manner. All one had to do was simply show up. Bonds have been directly aided by the trillions the Fed has purchased while equities have indirectly benefitted from the implied “put” or backstop inferred by these Fed actions. The Fed’s actions to keep rates artificially low have created market distortions that have interfered with many of our quantitative indicators.

When all equities or bonds generally get rewarded the same regardless of their quality or differences, it’s hard for the skilled manager to outperform. A rising tide of liquidity has lifted all boats making it easy for anyone to navigate in the harbor. But once the tide starts to recede, experience and skill are what matters. We have seen improvement with our models over the last year coinciding with the gradual reduction of QE. As markets return to “normal” we are better able to assess the risk and rewards of certain moves and strategies. We are seeing a number of opportunities develop that haven’t been available for years.

In the short run the market is looking tired. We have rejected the doom and gloom scenarios that have been so prevalent since the financial crisis and have caused many investors to miss out on the bull market. However, fewer stocks are hitting new highs and the breadth has been getting weaker. The uncertainty surrounding the end of QE and the timing of rate increases next year are factors contributing to the hesitancy. This is only natural and healthy in the long-run. As previously mentioned it also creates opportunities for us that have not been available for the last four years. Over the last few years we have held a cash position which has been a drag on performance. Going forward, this cash position is an advantage as it helps to cushion the downside and provide flexibility to take advantage of opportunities provided by any volatility and uncertainty.

Although the risks have risen, this doesn’t mean investors should get out completely. The market has been overdue for a correction for some time but it doesn’t mean that everything is ready to fall apart. Getting completely out now could cause you to miss crucial gains if stocks continue to rally as they have. The last four years have shown the futility of trying to time the market in an all in or out manner. It is still a bull market until proven otherwise.

The current economic data has been stronger indicating that the economic growth is picking up instead of getting weaker. Ultimately that is a good sign as it will support earnings growth that has been the key foundation for the current bull market. Any correction that comes will probably be more short-term and establish the next leg up for the market. Therefore, a correction would be viewed by us as an opportunity rather than a harbinger of doom. It is only natural after five years of market advances and ahead of interest rates starting to move up to get some market hesitancy or disruption. Our current exposures are to technology, energy, and materials which are late-cycle stocks and tend to do well in rising rate environments. We also continue to favor various segments of the healthcare sector such as medical device and healthcare providers. Several emerging market opportunities are also looking more promising than in the past and we have started to act in a few of these areas such as Mexico and Brazil.

It is no secret that we have been cautious on the bond market for some time. As the sun sets on QE the angst over when the Fed will begin to raise rates and by how much is growing. Markets always like to price actions in ahead of time and right now it seems the equity market is being affected to some degree by this interest rate uncertainty. However, the bond market has not moved much yet. Many thought that bonds would have a difficult year as they began to price in rate increases. So far, bonds have done the opposite and surprised many by having a good year. The inevitable is coming though and the window for bond gains is closing as we creep toward June of next year which is the most accepted time for rate increase to begin. Any equity market weakness will give bonds more time to put off the reckoning.

Although the potential for a bloodbath in the bond market is high, that doesn’t mean it will happen. It will probably be more like death by a thousand cuts. The Fed will be very slow and steady in raising rates as to minimize market disruption. After all, they do hold about $4.5 trillion of bonds!  Even if interest rates rise in a slow and gradual manner (which is what I believe will happen) bonds will still produce negative or flat real returns at best.

For example, take a look at the interest rate sensitivity of a broad composite of investment grade bonds such as the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index. If interest rates are a half to one percent higher a year from now, the index could be down 2.5 to over 5 percent respectively. The current yield of about two percent would still not offset the losses.

In preparation we have been making changes and getting ready for the coming environment. We have been early on this call which has caused us to underperform in Managed Income this year so far, but not by a lot and we are better positioned for what is to come. We believe this approach is the most effective from a risk/reward standpoint and will pay off in the environment to come. Now is the time to take a look at the risk in bond or fixed income holdings and make adjustments. The first one to two percent moves from the bottom will be the most painful.

Written by Nate White, Chief Investment Officer of Paragon Wealth Management

Disclaimer
Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Looking Past Scary Financial News Headlines

Posted October 15, 2014 by admin. tags:Tags: , , , , ,
Looking past the scary figures

I encourage you to learn more about investing and planning. It will pay dividends in many ways, and we are here to assist you as you take steps to educate yourself.

But I caution you about spending too much time in front of the financial news channels dotting the cable landscape or the many Internet sites that are just a mouse click away.

It’s not that they don’t report hard news. They do. But there are times when markets get volatile and the “shrillness meter” hits alarming levels.

Just a couple of months ago, when the Dow fell over 300 points in one day, I went onto the MarketWatch website and found a section highlighting the most popular stories.

1. “Warning: the Plunge in Stocks Is Just Beginning.” Well, stocks quickly recovered and claimed new highs.

2. “S&P 500 Suffers Largest Weekly Loss in 2 Years.” True, but we emphasize the longer term and continually stress that your plan should take into account setbacks in the market. Be very careful of allowing weekly volatility sidetrack a multiyear plan.

3. “Three Market Warning Signs that Predict a 20% Tumble.” See my comment on article number one, above.

The top three stories were playing on the fears of investors. Simply put, bad news sells. But it can be confusing if the noise isn’t filtered.

It’s been over 570 days since we’ve had a 10% drop in the S&P 500 Index, or a decline that would officially be called a “correction.” Going back to mid-1940s, the median time period between corrections has been 121 trading days, and the average has been 273 trading days.

Markets never move up in a straight line and we are due for a 10% pullback, which, coupled with the expanding economy, would be healthy. No one can accurately predict when that might occur but it will happen. The portfolios we recommend have a long-term time horizon and are designed to help you achieve your personal financial goals.

Stay focused on your goals and make adjustments that take into account changes in your personal circumstances. Ignore fear-mongering that can be deafening during market volatility.

Written by, Dave Young, President & Founder of Paragon Wealth Management

 

Disclaimer Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

It

Buyer Beware

Posted August 7, 2014 by admin. tags:Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Buyer Trap

Written by Nathan White, Chief Investment Officer of Paragon Wealth Management. 

The artificially low interest rates and asset purchases engineered by the Federal Reserve are causing a misallocation of private investment.  Investors and savers have been clamoring for anything with yield and it is prompting many people to put their money in horrible investments.  This is one of the unintended consequences of Fed’s extraordinary accommodative actions that have been in place for years now.  Investors are taking on a lot of risk and illiquidity to generate what are often very low returns.  They are sacrificing the returns and liquidity that are so crucially needed for the long-term.

There are a lot of bad financial products being sold to investors today that take advantage of investors’ desires to avoid risk and get a “safe” return.  Financial companies are always happy to create a product that sells the best in the current environment.  The angst from the financial crisis and the desire for yield in this low rate environment are helping many salespeople aggressively push the following bad investments:

Structured Products – Structured products are unsecured debt securities of banks and offer payouts that depend on the value of an underlying security.  The most common types pay out a fixed coupon as long the stock or underlying index stays above a buffer price.  If the price drops below the buffer price then the coupon is not paid and you could be issued the stock or participate in the downside below the buffer price.  The reason these products attract investors is the relatively higher coupon than is generally available from fixed income and the downside protection offered by the limited buffer.  I liken these structured products to buying a bond but having the downside risk of a stock.  The upside return is capped while only part of the downside exposure is protected.  Why sell away upside?  The end result is a lower return than could have been achieved with a simple combination of stocks and bonds.

Equity Indexed Annuities (EIA’s) – Equity Indexed Annuities offer a combination of participation in the market’s upside and a minimum guaranteed fixed return. The sales pitch goes along the lines of, “you get the upside of the stock market without any of the downside”!  Who wouldn’t want that!  Utopia! However, the old adage of “if it sounds too good to be true then it isn’t” certainly applies in this case.  EIA’s returns are tied to an index such as the S&P 500 of which the buyer gets a certain percentage of the increase but is also capped on the upside.  For example, an annuity with a participation rate of 70 percent and a cap of 8 percent would be credited with 7 percent of the index was up 10 percent.  If the index was up 30 percent the annuity would cap you at 8 percent.  If the market returns is negative or lower than then the credited index return there is a minimum guaranteed return of say 3 or 4 percent that is credited.  In addition, the calculations used to determine the index return are less than optimal and omit dividends. The insurance company also has the right to change the terms during the life of the contract.  Commissions are typically between 5 to 10 percent and surrender charges can be 10 percent or higher.  The annual fees and expenses are often 2 percent or higher which reduce the aforementioned possible returns even further.  The statements you get are very confusing and difficult to determine how much the annuity is really worth.  Complexity disguises the costs.  In a November 2011 Reuters article by Marla Brill, Eric Thomes, senior vice-president of Allianz (the largest issuer of EIA’s) said that the average annual returns of these products have been around 4 to 6 percent after expenses but not surrender charges.  He was quoted as saying, “These are for someone who’s looking for safety and is happy with the potential to get a slightly higher return than a fixed annuity or a bank CD”.  Here is an insurance executive’s own admission of what these products really are. The salespeople certainly don’t pitch them this way!

EIA’s have primarily been the domain of insurance agents but are now being peddled by brokers as well.  After brokers started selling these, FINRA (their regulatory arm), had to issue a warning to investors alerting them of the risks and characteristics of EIAs.  Not very many investment products ever get their own warning!  So, if you like limited upside, limited access to your money, high commissions and fees, complex formulas and changing terms, these annuities are for you.  The bottom line with these subpar products is they are an expensive way to get a low return.

Non-traded REITs – These are Real Estate Investment Trusts that are registered with the SEC but don’t trade on an exchange and have become very popular the last few years.  However, they are very expensive, highly illiquid, rife with conflicts of interest, can be very risky, resulting in returns lower than promised.  Front-end fees range from 12% to 15% with the typical commission of 7% going to the broker.  InvestmentNews reported that almost $20 billion of non-traded REITs were sold last year translating into about $1.4 billion in commissions.  The NAV or price of the REIT is often reported the same quarter after quarter and when combined with the income element produces a nice steady upward trending graph on sales literature that is pleasing to the eye.  They are positioned as low volatility investments but because they don’t trade the volatility can’t be measured.  In order to produce the illusion of a high payout they often use leverage and/or the dividend paid often includes a return of capital.   If investors saw how much had been taken out of their value in fees in their first statements they would be shocked.  In April of this year, the research firm Securities Litigation & Consulting Group produced a study that after fees and expenses, non-traded REITs had an average annual return of 5.2% from 1990 to 2013.  Now that the real estate market has largely recovered so have prices and that means you should be very careful about what type of real estate investments you buy.  Low interest rates are making many subpar or questionable projects seem good.  When interest rates inevitably rise it will expose these faulty investments.

All three of the above products share similar characteristics of high commissions and fees, illiquidity, and limited or low returns.  Because illiquid portfolios do not report their prices in a continuous manner they can create the illusion of stability or low risk.  The reward for illiquidity should be higher.  The perceived safety is expensive and usually not worth the cost.  There must be a price paid to avoid volatility.  One can often replicate the same strategies these products employ on the open market – that’s what the issuers are doing!  The true risk with many of these products is missing out on the upside returns that are crucial to investing.

So what’s the best way to reduce risk and get a decent return?  A diversified portfolio can be best “hedge” long-term.   A simple portfolio using stocks and bonds can generate income and help one stay ahead of inflation while providing access to funds if needed.  Historically, a portfolio with 60 to 70 percent bonds, 20 to 30 percent stocks and about 10 percent cash is close to the “sweet” spot for minimizing volatility.   From 1950 to 2013, a 30/60/10 mix of Stocks/Bonds/Cash has had an average return of about 7.7 percent with a maximum one year loss of 5.4 percent with over 84 percent of the years producing positive returns (Source: NDR Asset Allocation – Risk & Reward, based on S&P 500, Barclays Long-Term Treasury Index & T-Bills).

If you or anyone you know is being pitched on any of these products please contact us.  We can offer a lower cost liquid alternative.

Disclaimer
Paragon Wealth Management is a provider of managed portfolios for individuals and institutions. Although the information included in this report has been obtained from sources Paragon believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the judgment as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Blog Role

Meta